Archive for October, 2009

Online content and moral responsibilities

FightOnline content is volatile, out of control and sometimes harmful. We all know it and try hard to stay on the safe side and use common sense when posting our own writings on the Internet. Other than that, content is a great source of revenue, if played smart, and when it’s user generated, it can be turned into a money making resource with little to no creative effort.

But the tricky part with user generated content is responsibility. Technically, it’s enough to have a disclaimer on your website saying you are not responsible for what users post and then let all the ugliness of abuse, offense and gossip take over your online space.

The most recent successful recipe for online fame built on such negative concepts is College ABC, a gossip site for college students that encourages them to post anonymous messages about their colleagues. The amount of negative comments, going from simple gossip to insults and bullying is impressive. And the fact that it comes for people in college is even more disturbing, but not exactly surprising, as a degree does not guarantee intelligence, nor common sense. Continue reading

Popularity: 1% [?]

Knowing what you can’t do is good for business

bullseyeA few days ago I ran across a newspaper article that was supposed to be useful for readers looking to buy a laptop. It seemed to me it was either written by someone who knows nothing about computers and technology in general, or that they had found a very old article and translated it poorly. Either way, any reader trying to get advice from that article would have failed miserably. The paper obviously had no one tech savvy enough to write such an article. They still wanted it written and published it as it was, regardless of consequences.

Thinking of it, I realized there are actually quite a lot of businesses out there who claim to be able to do things they have no idea of. They are clueless about their real knowledge, talen and capabilities. Continue reading

Popularity: 1% [?]